Tables in exhibits and breaking bread

I used to hate people talking in exhibits. I wanted to read labels and focus on the artifacts and these jerks are getting mouthy and distracting. But as my thinking has changed about exhibits and as I come around to the social potential of museum programming, the more I want to hear people talking. But, just yammering away isn’t the point. Rather, talking between strangers and over the topic at hand—to extend the sense of discovery and revelation generated by the exhibits themselves into unexpected (if temporary) relationships between visitors. This means that creating socially productive dialog within and far beyond the exhibit requires well-designed prompts built into the exhibit itself.

We might could do this in a variety of ways. Asking questions and soliciting responses via post-it notes, for instance (but I’ve never seen that successfully promote conversation.) Beyond the exhibit we might offer hashtag that invites visitors to extend the exhibit and its discussion themselves onto the Internet.

Lately I’ve seen a very simple and elegant tool to encouraging participation, learning, and discussion in exhibit spaces—a table.

In the From Memory to Action: Meeting the Challenge of Genocide space at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, designers positioned a table in the middle of a gallery that urged visitors to action. Overhead projectors showed videos on a table and embedded keyboards allowed visitors to enter their names and email addresses to subscribe to a newsletter on contemporary genocides.


At the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History, a long dinner table stood at the center of the FOOD: Transforming the American Table, 1950-2000 exhibit. Now, I didn’t pay much attention to the interactives on the table, so I can’t particularly describe the point, but it was surrounded by half a dozen kids who did pay attention.


The dinner table at the NUEVOlution! exhibit has a lazy susan at the middle with examples of Latin and southern food in wooden cutouts. The table invites you to create your own fusion plate.


Tables evoke family dinners where, over dinner, parents and children recall the day, argue, or otherwise generate memories. Tables also evoke a deep Christian ethic of breaking bread. In this tradition, potentially hostile strangers choose instead communion over a meal. Sitting at a table and sharing is a sacred act.

So, how can well-designed adornments—projected screens, embedded keyboards, cutouts of food, stenciled text, an extended chair—prompt strangers to sit at a table and talk?

One thought on “Tables in exhibits and breaking bread

  1. These three examples all included some kind of interactive as the setting to draw people to it, but I’m wondering what would happen if an empty table and a few chairs would draw the same attention? Some museums I’ve been to have benches made to fit the theme of the exhibits that have sparked conversations between people taking a walking break or having their attention brought to the design of the bench. I really like the idea of a roundtable-like experience, if it fits the space.

    That said, in imaginary, unlimited budget and amazing community engagement land, in our own exhibit I wonder if having the setup of a prison visitation where visitors could sit between on either side of the glass and speak through a phone would have similar effects.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s